Saturday, November 18, 2006

Hizb ut tahrir.

Following recent revelations on newsnight about the activities of these arseholes, it got me wondering about these islamists.
A quick perusal of their constitution reveals their 'desire' for the re establishment of a caliphate, abolished by Ataturk in 1924. One wonders whether living under sharia law would be acceptable to atheists, secularists, non muslims, jews and gays.
These people don't believe in democracy, in fact they refuse to defer to man made laws, and submit to sharia only. They are often found at polling stations asking muslims not to vote( apparently, it's unislamic!) and at demonstrations attacking 'zionists' and American foreign policy.

I wonder what would make a rational human being join a grooup that advocates sharia law, and all its barbaric guises, in to the UK? It is shocking to see these people try and represent themselves as the mainstream. Under sharia law, i wouldn't stand a chance of airing any of my views because i'm a kufr(non believer).

These people want to introduce religious laws just like the Taliban did in Afghanistan. It is frightening to see people brought up in the west and enjoying the benefits of secularism fall prey to medieval thinking.

Here's the hizb constitution: fucking unbelieveable.
http://www.hizb-ut-tahrir.info/english/constitution.htm

Their success in the UK doesn't augur well for women, gays, non muslims, jews, and secularists.
The imposition of medieval laws in any country is a frightening prospect regardless of the religion that advocates it. I wouldn't like HT to be banned, i would rather the media and muslims expose their hideous fundamentalist agenda tothe public.

4 Comments:

At 5:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

as far as I know they are not advocating shariah law in the UK, if they did they would be banned.

secondly, a caliphate only makes sense if u compare it to the dictatorships and monarchies that dominate the Middle East.

Here is a website that might shed some more light on all of this:

caliphate.co.uk

 
At 5:45 PM, Blogger karenexile said...

Why do you have to choose between extremes: a caliphate or a dictatorship?
Secularism would prevent sharia law being imposed in the 21st century. I wonder if any women or gays would love to live under sharia law in a caliphate?

Reestablishing the caliphate is imperial nonsense. Just like asking for a revival of the British empire. Secularism is the way forward for the middle east. Something they could learn from Turkey. Keep religion out of politics.

 
At 6:49 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Article 13
Every individual is innocent until proven guilty. No person shall be punished without a court sentence. Torturing is absolutely forbidden and whoever inflicts torture on anyone shall be punished."


SOunds like caliphate ain't all that bad as UK/US

 
At 12:50 PM, Blogger karenexile said...

Until they start chopping off hands and stoning women. Still thinks it's not bad? Just look at Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan under the Taliban. Think of the world under religious barbarity....it frightens me.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home